The internship credit
you can defend.
IntelleSkill delivers the internship credit AICTE already requires you to award, through projects built from today's job requirements, with per-student, human-reviewed, verifiable evidence for your accreditation file.
No employer tie-up and no student travel.
You already have to award
these credits.
14–20 credits
Internship, entrepreneurial activity or project work, for every B.Tech student.
600–700 hours
Per student, staged across the second, fourth, sixth and eighth semesters.
Online internship
Listed by AICTE as an eligible activity for these credits.
This applies to every AICTE-approved institution, whether or not industry cooperates.
Certificates assert.
Accreditation asks for evidence.
How the credit is usually evidenced today
- A certificate on a letterhead
- No record of what was built
- No assessment
- No per-student evidence
What the NBA manual allocates marks to
- 15marks · Industry Internship and Summer Training (2.2.5)
- 15marks · Industry Interaction (2.2.4)
- 120marks · Attainment of Course and Programme Outcomes (Criterion 3)
A bundle of certificates answers none of it.
Evidence, produced as a by-product of delivery.
Projects aren't invented at random. Each one is generated from what the job market is asking for in that role today, and from the kinds of requirements Intellesphere's own clients bring us.
Project Brief
A project brief generated from current job requirements, for that student's role and industry domain.
A different project for every student.
Reviewed Documentation
Planning documentation, approved by a named reviewer before coding opens.
Human gate one.
Observed Code
Code written and run inside the platform, with no local installation.
What the platform saw, not what was claimed.
Concept Checks
Concept-check results for every task, recorded before the task counts.
Pasted work does not get through.
Sprint Approvals
Sprint approvals from a reviewer, each one required before the next sprint opens.
Human gate two.
Scored Certificate
A final score and a certificate with a public verification link.
A number, a reviewer and a link.
Exportable per student, for your accreditation file.
AI generates the problem.
A person signs the outcome.
AI generates each project and assists the evaluation. A Senior Developer or Product Owner from IntelleSkill then reviews the work and approves it before the student can move forward.
Senior Developer
Reviews code quality, architecture & sprint deliverables
Product Owner
Reviews PRD, HLD documentation & project scope
Gate 1 — Documentation Review
Triggered after: Student submits PRD & HLD
- Senior Dev or PO reviews the project plan & design docs
- Checks: scope clarity, feasibility, tech stack alignment
- Decision: Approve → sprints unlock | Revise → student reworks docs
- Feedback is written directly in the platform for the student to see
Gate 2 — Sprint Review (×3 sprints)
Triggered after: Student completes all tasks in a sprint
- Senior Dev reviews submitted code & task deliverables
- Checks: correctness, code quality, real-world standards
- Decision: Approve → next sprint unlocks | Changes requested → student revises
- Detailed written feedback visible in the student's dashboard
- Repeat for each of the 3 sprints before certificate is issued
Who reviews.
We don't publish names; your faculty can sit in on a live review session.
Sprint reviewer · Backend
Senior full-stack technical lead building enterprise web applications on .NET, SQL Server and Angular, deployed on Azure with CI/CD pipelines. Has led development teams, run code reviews and led user acceptance testing across energy, retail, oil and gas, and consumer goods.
12+ years · M.Tech, Software Engineering
Sprint reviewer · Generative AI and NLP
Lead data scientist working in generative AI, NLP and large language models, deep learning and computer vision. M.Tech in AI and Machine Learning from an IIT. Applied work in semiconductors and banking analytics.
5+ years
Documentation reviewer · Architecture and delivery
Enterprise platform architect and transformation leader: AI-native platform design, event-driven and cloud-native architecture, and delivery governance across defence, healthcare, manufacturing and enterprise services. Has trained and mentored trainee developers.
20+ years
AI assists. People decide.
AI generates each project, checks code as it is written and builds the concept checks. It does not approve a student's work. A reviewer does.
Every AI evaluation sits behind the two human review gates.
Project Generation
Generates each project from current job requirements for the student's role, in sectors like Banking, Telecom, Healthcare, Retail and E-Commerce
Code Evaluation
Analyzes correctness, quality, and best practices instantly
Concept Checkpoints
Generates assessments to validate real understanding
AI Mentor Chat
Context-aware assistant that understands code and tasks
Repo Health Analysis
Evaluates GitHub structure, commits, and documentation quality
Five roles, built from what each is being hired for now.
Each student picks one role and an industry domain. Their projects are generated from today's job requirements for that role.
AI/ML Engineer
Model training, MLOps, NLP, and Computer Vision
GenAI Developer
LLM integration, RAG pipelines, and prompt engineering
Data Scientist
Data cleaning, statistical modeling, and visualization
Backend Developer
REST APIs, database integration, and server optimization
Cybersecurity Engineer
Penetration testing, secure code review, and incident response
Currently for CSE, IT, AI&ML and Data Science departments.
For your role
One programme, and a different reason to care depending on where you sit.
Training & Placement Officer
Internship coverage for a full batch without sourcing a single company, and a link to show a recruiter what the student did.
Request a campus demoHead of Department
Per-student evidence of outcome attainment, on projects that follow the current market without rewriting your syllabus.
Run a pilot with one sectionPrincipal and management
Every student completes a reviewed, scored project with a verifiable public record. No employer dependency, no infrastructure.
Start a partnership conversationIQAC coordinator
Per-student records generated as a by-product, so nobody collects them by hand.
Ask what the evidence pack containsFaculty
Your students do the work and our reviewers review it. You get a dashboard and no correction pile.
Sit in on a review sessionStart with one section, for one semester.
One section of one department, typically 40 to 60 students, capped at a number our reviewers can carry.
Scope Agreed in Writing
Cohort size, success criteria and the evidence deliverable, before anything starts.
Orientation and Roster
We run a one-hour session, and your faculty coordinator gets a walkthrough of the dashboard and reporting.
Cohort Runs
Projects, review gates and concept checks, with progress visible to the TPO and coordinator.
Evidence Pack and Review
Per-student records delivered, then a review meeting with the Principal.
What your college commits to
- Announce the programme on your own channels
- Name a faculty coordinator
- Give a one-hour orientation slot
- Provide reliable connectivity
- Hold the end-of-pilot review
Priced per student, per semester. The figure comes with the written pilot proposal.
Keep the free platforms you already use.
They teach. We supervise and evidence.
Use them for content, and use IntelleSkill for the credit you have to defend.
What we will not promise.
Your institution is never exposed by a claim we made on your behalf.
No placement guarantee, and nothing that implies one
No company names or hiring partners
No claim of recognition by AICTE, NBA, NAAC or any other body
No cohort larger than our reviewers can review well
Industry-Verifiable Certificates
Unique Verification URL
Each certificate links to a verifiable public page
Publicly Verifiable Record
Anyone with the link can check the certificate and its score
Score-Based Evaluation
Reflects real performance across all sprints
LinkedIn Ready
You can showcase directly on LinkedIn profiles
Plan a pilot for
your next semester.
We will walk you through the platform, the pilot scope and the evidence each student produces. Twenty minutes, on your campus or online.